Stepping into the unforgiving world of maximum-security prisons, where justice often takes a twisted turn, the story of a convicted child killer’s swift demise behind bars serves as a stark reminder of the raw, unspoken codes that govern inmate life. Subhan Anwar, a 24-year-old serving a life sentence for the horrific murder of a toddler, found himself on the receiving end of vigilante violence just four years into his incarceration. What started as an ordinary day in Long Lartin prison in Worcestershire, England, escalated into a calculated ambush by two fellow lifers, Gary Smith and Lee Newell, who strangled him in his own cell. This chilling tale not only exposes the dangers lurking in high-security facilities but also raises questions about prison hierarchies, motives rooted in moral outrage, and the limits of the legal system in protecting even the most despised criminals. As we unpack the details, from the premeditated attack to the courtroom drama, it’s clear this case shook the foundations of correctional oversight and left families grappling with mixed emotions.
The Lead-Up: A Convict’s Troubled Path to Prison
Subhan Anwar’s journey to Long Lartin began with a crime that horrified the public. In 2009, he was convicted in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, for the murder of his partner’s two-year-old daughter, Sanam Navsarka. The little girl suffered unimaginable abuse, including fractures to all four limbs, before succumbing to fatty deposits flooding her bloodstream—a death the sentencing judge branded as “beyond belief” in its cruelty. Anwar received a life sentence with a minimum of 23 years, but his time inside was marked by prior violence; he had already survived an assault by two inmates while held in Doncaster. Despite this, at Long Lartin, he reportedly turned a corner, becoming a model prisoner. He served as a wing representative, assisted other inmates with their issues, and avoided any disciplinary problems for four solid years. His family later emphasized this transformation, portraying him as someone who had formed unlikely friendships—even with his eventual killers—while maintaining hope for proving his innocence in Sanam’s death through ongoing appeals.But prison life isn’t always about rehabilitation. Beneath the surface, a so-called “moral code” simmers among inmates, where those convicted of crimes against children often become targets for retribution. Anwar’s notoriety as a child killer likely painted a bullseye on his back, setting the stage for the fatal encounter on February 14, 2013.
The Fatal Attack: A Calculated and Cold Execution
The murder unfolded with eerie precision in the late afternoon. Armed with improvised weapons—a pen and a toothbrush sharpened into deadly tools—48-year-old Gary Smith and 44-year-old Lee Newell trailed Anwar into his cell around 6 p.m. They locked the door from the inside, blocked the peephole to avoid detection, and pounced. Anwar’s ankles were bound with about two meters of adhesive tape, immobilizing him as they used his own tracksuit pants to strangle him. Additional injuries included a bruise on his forehead, possibly from a punch, and another on his right shoulder, likely inflicted by the makeshift weapons discarded under the cell window.What followed was perhaps the most disturbing part: utter nonchalance. Instead of panicking or fleeing, Smith casually prepared a cup of hot chocolate with icing sugar for Newell, who appeared “a bit shaky.” They lingered in the cell for about 40 minutes before one of them buzzed the prison control room via intercom. “I have taken the guy in this cell hostage. It’s not a joke. I think he’s dead,” the voice said matter-of-factly. When pressed for a reason, the response was chilling: “I’m bored, it was something to do.” Negotiators arrived, and Newell cryptically added, “I don’t know. I wish I knew myself,” before declaring, “He is with Allah.” The duo finally unlocked the door at 8:20 p.m., revealing Anwar’s lifeless body face down on the bed, hands unbound but ankles still secured, with clear signs of strangulation marking his neck.This level of detachment horrified investigators and the court, underscoring a premeditated act rather than a spur-of-the-moment brawl. While the exact motive remains murky, the prosecution hinted at the prison’s disdain for child offenders as a driving force, amplifying the sense of vigilante justice at play.
The Trial and Sentencing: No Mercy for the Merciless
The case landed at Warwick Crown Court, where Smith and Newell—both already lifers for prior murders—faced justice. Newell had been imprisoned since the late 1980s for strangling 56-year-old Mary Neal in Norwich after conning his way into her home, hiding her body in a cupboard, and stealing a mere £60. Smith, jailed in 1999, was convicted of killing 22-year-old Ali Hassan in Leicester, stripping his body naked, and dumping it in a quarry over suspicions of him being a police informant.During the trial, the pair pointed fingers at each other, but the jury needed less than four hours to convict both of murder. Sentencing day brought more drama: Smith and Newell refused to leave their holding cells, demanding to be returned to prison after the judge permitted Anwar’s grieving parents to sit in the court’s well instead of the public gallery. Undeterred, Mr. Justice Jeremy Baker delivered his verdict via video link, imposing whole-life sentences—the harshest penalty under UK law, meaning no chance of parole ever. He condemned the “almost complete lack of emotion” post-killing as “one of the most chilling aspects,” noting the absence of any remorse or mitigating circumstances. This rare whole-life order placed them among Britain’s most notorious offenders, ensuring they’d rot behind bars indefinitely.
Family Reactions and Broader Implications
Anwar’s family, devastated yet resolute, issued a statement branding Smith and Newell as “animals” unfit for society. They mourned the loss of a son they believed had reformed, highlighting his role in helping fellow inmates and his unblemished record at Long Lartin. Despite the tragedy, they vowed to continue fighting to clear his name in Sanam’s case, insisting his friendships with the killers made the betrayal even more heartbreaking.This incident spotlighted flaws in prison security, prompting reviews of how high-risk inmates are housed and monitored. It also ignited debates on whether the system’s failure to protect vulnerable prisoners—regardless of their crimes—undermines true justice. In a broader sense, it reflects the perilous underbelly of incarceration, where personal vendettas can override official safeguards, leading to cycles of violence that extend beyond the original offenses.
Ongoing Legacy: Lessons from a Tragic Chain of Events
Years later, the case remains a cautionary tale about the intersections of crime, punishment, and inmate dynamics. While Anwar’s short stint behind bars ended violently, it underscores the need for better protective measures in prisons worldwide. As society grapples with rehabilitating offenders versus ensuring safety, stories like this force us to confront the human costs on all sides—from victims’ families to those caught in the system’s grind.
#ChildKillerPrisonMurder #SubhanAnwarCase #PrisonVigilanteJustice #WholeLifeSentence #LongLartinAttack #InmateCode #TrueCrimeUK
