In a heated encounter that has drawn widespread attention online, a police officer’s attempt to intimidate a man by drawing his taser backfired dramatically. The incident, captured on video and shared across multiple social media platforms, shows a verbal confrontation that quickly escalates — not because of physical aggression, but because of firm resistance and defiance from the civilian involved.
The confrontation unfolded in what appears to be a public parking area, where officers were engaged in a separate discussion with another individual. As this was happening, a man nearby began inspecting the tires of a police vehicle, apparently tapping or checking them. This unusual act caught the attention of Officer Bigalow, whose badge number was later identified as 2185, and set off the tense exchange.
The officer approached the man and immediately confronted him in a commanding and aggressive tone, stating:
“Don’t put your hands on me. I promise you. You better [__] stop. You’re going to pull your taser for what?”
Rather than retreating or lowering his voice, the man confidently asserted his right to speak freely, responding:
“I promise you, you can’t make me stop talking. I’ll talk if I want.”
At this point, Officer Bigalow drew his taser, clearly attempting to control or intimidate the man into compliance. However, the man’s firm verbal response appeared to catch the officer off guard. The situation was no longer a routine interaction — it had become a public spectacle.
The video shows the officer identifying himself:
“I’m Officer Bigalow. My badge number is 2185.”
He then proceeds to question the man’s behavior, asking why he was “kicking the vehicles.” The man responds calmly but assertively:
“I’m just checking the tires, man. Why? Why not? Is that against the law?”
The officer accuses the man of interference, claiming that he was disrupting their conversation with another person. The man responds by challenging the officer’s definition of interference, stating:
“Interference is an obstruction. Interference is a physical thing. Am I being physical?”
His words highlight a critical legal distinction that many citizens often overlook: in most jurisdictions, interference typically involves physical obstruction, not mere speech. By standing firm and continuing to talk, the man exposed a gray area in how some officers interpret “interference” during public encounters.
As the argument continued, the officer demanded that the man stop interfering. The man refused, maintaining his stance that he was not doing anything illegal. His tone was provocative but controlled, making it clear he would not be intimidated simply by the presence of a taser. The officer eventually lowered the taser, but the tension between the two remained thick.
This incident has sparked intense online debate. Some viewers applaud the man for standing up for his rights, calling his reaction a perfect example of knowing the law and refusing to be bullied. Others argue that while his points were technically correct, his confrontational tone unnecessarily escalated the situation and could have put him at risk.
Legal experts commenting on similar cases have noted that drawing a taser without clear physical threat can raise questions about proportionality and police conduct. Tasers are meant to be less-lethal tools, often used to subdue violent or resistant suspects, not as verbal intimidation devices during disagreements.
The footage also reignites broader conversations about citizens recording police interactions. In recent years, the spread of smartphones and body cams has brought unprecedented visibility to confrontations between the public and law enforcement. This particular incident serves as another example of how citizens’ knowledge of their rights can alter the dynamics of a police encounter in real time.
Comment sections under the video are flooded with passionate opinions. One viewer wrote:
“He’s right. Talking is not interference. The officer tried to flex authority and got shut down. Respect.”
Another user countered:
“While the man didn’t break the law, the way he talked to the officer made everything worse. He should’ve walked away.”
For many, this moment encapsulates the growing tension between assertive citizens and law enforcement. As public awareness of civil rights increases, these kinds of confrontations are becoming more common — and more publicly scrutinized.
As of now, no arrests or formal charges have been reported, and the police department involved has not issued any official statement regarding Officer Bigalow’s actions. It remains unclear whether any internal review is underway.
What is clear, however, is that the video has struck a nerve, highlighting how the power dynamics between police and citizens can shift rapidly when individuals are informed, confident, and unafraid to speak back — even in the face of a drawn taser.
